[menu]

dreams 2001   dreams 2002



Intro

I've been trying to do something with the material from my dreams for a long time, but except for weaving them into my fiction, either directly or by turning them into standard prose, I haven't been able to do them justice, because there is something about dreams that is magical, and except for the occasional odd poem they might generate, I can't seem to capture that magic. Dreams are great content from which to build fiction, but using them in this way is not very satisfying. The process leaves a lot behind.

I've been studying dreams and dreaming for a long time now. I think I know all of the theories. Some of them are pretty good, but none of them is quite complete, from my phenomenological point of view. And so I present this new format, a more direct representation than artistic, accompanied by introductory material, odd notes, and an outline of what I consider to be the most important aspects of dream theory. Admittedly, the outline is very incomplete. There is no pretense here to science, but some of the research that generates this outline is scientific.

This material is nothing more than a brief summary of stuff I've come across in my research that I most like. And although the theory appeals to me in a rational sense (if I allow myself, I can be a great control freak), ultimately, theories about dreams negate the process that dreaming attempts to initiate, that is, an attempt of the greater self to provoke us into deeper insight. It's nice to theorize, but ultimately, theory is dreaming's antithesis.

The content here is every bit as important to me as the history of my personal (waking) "reality" (my thoughthistory journal) or my fiction. There is something about the simple act of documenting dreams that is significant, apart from the analysis that automatically occurs as I consider my dreams in detail. We live in a whole other world for a large part of our lives, and very few of us seem to want to know it. If we remember dreams at all, it is for the few brief minutes lying in bed in the morning before our days begin. This is not enough for me. I need more. I pursue my dreams, daily. These web pages are evidence of the incompleteness of that activity. As I said, I don't know quite what to make of this material. And so, I've decided to present it as it is. Maybe it will make something of itself.

Our Fears

All of the fears we dream about at night, we also think about during the day, but the day thoughts are mostly unconscious. And conveniently, when we wake up, we tend to forget our dreams. But the nature of dreaming is such that while we sleep, our fears can become conscious, which is just a little bit of evidence that indicates that dreams are the same material as unconscious waking thoughts. The best (or worst) of our waking thoughts are never known by us, because they are too painful. They are better realized in dreams. If we study our dreams closely, we can come to know the fears we feel all day long, but never know.

The Mystery of Dreaming

There is no real mystery to dreams, unless it's due to the fact that we don't readily know this part of ourselves. My favorite theory is that dreams are simply an old mode of thinking. Our physiology has programmed into it a wish, desire, or motive to sleep--so that it may dream, thus satisfying its earlier, superceded nature.

[Carl Sagan, in The Dragons of Eden, maintains that reptiles, whose brain we have as inherited as the most basic, primitive layer of our primate, three-layered brain, exists full time in a dream state (Sagan, 160). If we had the conscious use of the reptilian part of our brain (the R-complex) during the day, we would be walking around in a state of perpetual dreaming. Nice. I think I might like that.]

We don't coincidentally dream because we happen to need sleep for other reasons, although it's easy to see how we might come to this conclusion, since we feel we need rest and as we rest, mostly unconscious, we continue thought patterns at a base level. Rather, we fall into sleep, which is a very strange state if you think about it, an unconsciousness imposed upon our minds by our bodies, so that we may experience a state of mind different to the advanced, mostly rational, or at least highly programmed one that we are locked into during our waking state. There is no reason why the body should have to pass into this unconscious state in order to rest. Our bodies can sit or lie down and get all the rest they need, and even if we would choose not to do it, eventually we would collapse from pure physical exhaustion, and yet there is still no reason why we should then become comatose--except that our conscious minds will interfere with the processes of the more primitive state of thought that our physiologies need to express.

This is especially true of the more A-type personalities among us. For these people, and for all of us, the body, in its genetic wisdom, shuts us down, so that we may experience a more primitive mode where our minds are not so cluttered with the more advanced thought processes, when we may "think" as we once did before we became the great minds that we are today. This is a process analogous (or maybe even identical) to the reptilian and limbic regions of the brain being overlaid with the more advanced neocortex. Yes, we are humans, a higher form of animal, but we are nevertheless animals, and our brains reveal this fact by their layered nature. And our dreams reveal this fact also: we were once less evolved in our thought processes. Thought and feeling ran together with much less compartmentalization, and this is revealed in dreams, and we must experience this, or we remain cut off from our greater selves, which causes problems of adaptation. [Neurotics (anal retentives), for example, struggle to maintain total conscious control. They may even strive obsessively to dominate the contents of their dreams, in such ways as maintaining a dream journal and engaging in an ongoing practice of dream interpretation.]

We dream so that we may adapt to a world which is continually throwing new information at us. We reorient ourselves in sleep, becoming more unified with a world we are a part of, but often feel, by virtue of our higher minds, that we are separate from. Our dreams are our core way of thinking, our base self expressing itself. The fact that we choose most often to ignore them is a sign that we need them all the more. Our advanced selves ignore our lower level selves, and so basic physiology continually attempts to restore us to the more undivided self we have departed from via advanced thought.

It is said that there are yogis who do not need sleep--because they have attuned themselves to the natural universe, thus eliminating the need of a periodic re-coordination between the waking and the "inner" selves. (There is no inner self; modern science has shown us that we are all one continuum, which yogis train themselves to experience more fully.) All these yogis need, then, is physical rest. This is the state of meditation. As it is perfected, sleep becomes unnecessary, because dreaming becomes a waking state flowing without interference from minds that continually attempt to advance beyond their limitations. This is not a criticism of advanced thought, which is a wonderful process. (It allows me to do what I am doing now.) It is merely a statement of fact. We are mentally limited, but experientially, we are everything, when we do not deny it. So, where is the mystery of dreams? In the minds of those of us who have forgotten who we really are. We are our dreams, forgotten. The mystery is our own selves.

In fairness to Sagan, he looks at this rationale for sleeping and dreaming a bit differently, sort of from the other side. He takes the natural selection perspective that we dream because it is the state of mind (state of the brain) of reptiles, who slept at night because it was safer for them to remain motionless and thus not become some larger predator's meal; and so nature selected those who remained most motionless (Sagan, 142).

It happens to be our (mis)fortune that we evolved from reptiles and inherited their brain as the basis of our own; and with it we inherited its physiological propensity to sleep. And dreaming just happens to be the reptile's normal consciousness, which is, then, the reptile awakening to a temporary consciousness of his environment in the night.

I agree with this selection viewpoint, but I see a higher-level function operating, even higher than the mammalian limbic and neo-cortical add-ons that Sagan defines; that is, the unification theory mentioned above, that we need to reunite our divided mind and even our sense of universal self, where everyone is everyone, flowing among each other's psyches freely, experiencing each other's thoughts and feelings in a way that animals have [and perhaps still do; to wit, dogs and cats who seem to be able to predict an owners' comings and goings ahead of time, finding their way home when lost hundreds of miles away, etc.], utilizing a synesthesia of all senses and perceptions beyond the senses, a less evolved, more affective/intuitive state experienced before the higher faculties developed and began to interfere with that universal perception of the unity of all things.

Integration Machine

Every dream is a symbol system representing the mind, usually the unconscious aspects of it. The "real" elements (i.e., those real people, places, and things) that appear in the dream are the introjections into the mind from the "outside" world. Those fabricated elements (i.e., those people, places, and things that do not exist in the real world, or those composite elements, some part of which have a real world character) are the evidence of the function of the mind. Taken together, these elements demonstrate the interplay between the real world and the self, that microcosm of the world we carry within. We continually adjust that microcosm as that which is exterior to us becomes interior through the process of experience. If we live for a very long time, continuing to dream and attending closely to the process, we will eventually become well-integrated people. Dreams coordinate us with the world, but it takes many years for wisdom to develop to show us how to attend to and deal with our difficulties. If properly attended to, dream analysis and interpretation can be a most effective therapy.

Present v. Past-State Dreaming

When I wake up in the middle of the night, usually out of a dream, but not necessarily, or not necessarily remembered, I (think to) attribute any affect I am experiencing to my past. I rationalize that I have had experiences that I have not yet fully dealt with, and until I do, they will keep returning in my dreams to haunt me. And maybe this is true, and maybe it's not. It's entirely possible, even probable, that I feel the way I do simply because I feel the way I do, a physio-psychological state independent of the past, a true present-bound existence that I only then set about to associate with past events and attribute past (known or theorized) affect to them. I may be far more advanced than I want to think I am and am only stuck in a pattern of analysis whereby I make past connections where none need exist, except as an historical pattern, nothing more.

And this may function even when I dream. I could be experiencing the present affect while I sleep, but not dreaming, which after all is a purer state re tuning into physiological/ psychological conditions, and then going into a dream state and conjuring up past events that are comparable to the affect I am in, motivated not by the dream, but my present psycho-physiological condition--and then subsequently awakening and further developing the fiction that I am dredging up past events via dreaming so that my conscious mind may deal with them. We may be giving our unconscious minds way too much credit when we attribute to dreaming a kind of intentional self-therapy. That kind of thing may be more a product of our waking consciousness imposing its rationalizations onto a dream content that is much more present-state bound than we want to believe.

Now that I've stated this theory, which as I began to write I thought may have been only a possibility, I think it the actual fact of the situation, and I have been previously deluded re how much my dreams direct my self-therapeutic attention to my past. But this is to be expected. This is what the conscious mind does, latches onto what it thinks and makes a possibility the truth for no other reason than it has thought it and therefore, by God, it must be true. The conscious self is narcissistic in that way.

More likely, though, both conditions, the dream as a reactive present-state indicator and the dream as a proactive revealer of past affect/pathology, are functional psychological states, operating either selectively or simultaneously. We, each of us separately and all of us together, are far more multi-tasking than any theory suggests. Lots of operations are occurring as continuously concurrent events in our minds. The universe is a mind-machine, and this planet is a local hot spot of cosmic mental activity. [And I'm only considering four dimensions here. I don't even want to get into here what might be happening extra-dimensionally.]


an old dream categories list that still has some value to me.

I include this here for the sake of completion as I attempt to wind up this topic and put it to rest, since I have been, recently, more successfully incorporating my dreams into my journals and my fiction. (Maybe there will be no more dreams added to this dream dream journal. I don't yet know.)

  1. Jungian archetypes (shadow, anima/animus, self, etc.)
  2. Freudian symbolism (id, ego, superego, etc.)
  3. Bio-computer processing of previous day's thought and experience (cf. Sagan, 151)
  4. Gestalt theory (each dream image as an aspect of self)
  5. Wish fulfillment
  6. Behavior rehearsal (intuition/psychic) - the presentation of future possibilities for thought, action, belief, attitude
  7. Biochemical code interpretation (DNA,etc.)
  8. Psi phenomena (if they really exist)

A Partial List of Personal Dream Symbols


dreams 2001   dreams 2002

[top] [menu]